Authentication and permissions
How users are identified, how sessions are handled, and how access to features and data is restricted.
AI-driven analysis and independent specialist review of your source code. We review both in-house and AI-generated code, and examine security-critical logic, dependencies and sensitive access credentials.
The analysis is adapted to the language, framework, architecture and the information the system protects.
How users are identified, how sessions are handled, and how access to features and data is restricted.
How data from users and other systems reaches database queries, templates and other security-critical functions.
Keys, access tokens and password credentials stored in the repository, and how the code handles sensitive information.
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies and the conditions under which they can be exploited in your application.
Rules and data flows that need targeted manual review, beyond general pattern matches.
Settings and defaults that can affect exposure. The settings actually used in production are checked separately when that is in scope.
The code review applies to the agreed code version. An installed vulnerable component or a rule match does not automatically mean the system is exploitable. We assess whether the vulnerability can be reached and exploited in your application, and report what remains to be investigated.
The report helps both the development team and whoever needs to prioritise the security work.
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE · NOT A CUSTOMER RESULT
We agree on repositories, code version, technology choices and security objectives.
Permissions, code handling and the terms for the analysis tools are set before we start.
AI-driven analysis and automated checks point out areas for targeted review and validation.
You receive results and remediation proposals. A further review or retest is agreed when needed.
Ahead of a launch, for major changes, when taking over a codebase, or when you need an independent assessment of security-critical parts.
The scope is set in the engagement. Automated analysis gives breadth and identifies areas for targeted manual review; we describe which parts have actually been reviewed.
We review the code without changing it and hand remediation proposals to your team. If we are also to produce or carry out code changes, that needs to be agreed separately.
Code review examines how the system is built. Pen-test probes the behaviour of a running system. Together they can give a better understanding of both the cause and the practical impact.
Tell us which technologies you use and what you want reviewed. We will propose a clear scope.